(05-22-2014, 06:50 PM)Berkilak de Hautdesert Wrote: [ -> ]As far as Juliette forgiving Nick, what if there were no Wesen involved, Nick just got really drunk, and the next morning finds himself in bed with one of Juliette's girlfriends? I can't see Juliette forgiving that. So I'm wondering can she make her mind wrap around the whole Adalind doppleganger thing, or will her mind subconsciously revert to the waking up hungover with my best friend scenario?
You are in entirely different territory here. Don't forget Nick was a victim of trickery in this incident. He believed he was sleeping with the woman he's committed to. Granted I have my issues with this but I'll get to that later.
What you are suggesting is a complete 180; a situation that in contrast would be under Nick's control, in which he'd know the other woman is NOT Juliette even piss ass drunk and yet on some level still chose to be with her.
The two scenarios are in no way related.
Honestly I felt Juliette's initial anger over the incident was uncalled for considering the circumstances, not to mention her own victimizing by Adalind. When she was put in a coma and woke with no memory of Nick and the hots for Renard.
Nick had never for a second held any of that against her and had given her his full support with no expectation of getting her back let alone without ever pushing her to remember him.
She owed him for that, she should have remembered what it's like to be tricked into having feelings for or being with a partner other than your own and been more fair.
(05-27-2014, 07:40 PM)BymagaJones Wrote: [ -> ]Nick and Juliette seem like that couple who've been together for so long that their attachment doesn't demand that they do all those things newly romantic people do. They're comfortable with each other, but not so comfortable that they have nothing to talk about anymore. So while I don't see sparks, I see a comfort level that comes with familiarity.
This is exactly why I somewhat feel like Nick should have felt something different about "Juliette's" touch, her kiss. Though I myself have never had a boyfriend, I would think that someone's touch would be unique to them like their fingerprints.
For example perhaps one person's handshake is a little more firm than another person's. Thus if the person with the firm handshake tried to impersonate the person with the looser handshake the way Adalind disguised as Juliette and still delivered the firm handshake that should be a giveaway to anyone who knows the loose handshake person. That's something a visible disguise couldn't hide. Adalind would still kiss and touch Nick like herself, she wouldn't know how to impersonate Juliette's intimacy. So I can see how Juliette could be hurt if that was what was on her mind.
It seemed messed up to me that all it took for Trubel who barely knows Juliette to smell a rat was a simple comment "I hate Bacon". Though that was an awesome spot on her part.
(05-22-2014, 06:50 PM)Berkilak de Hautdesert Wrote: [ -> ]Now, let's assume Juliette and Nick have their second separation, and Nick and Trubel end up sharing quarters. Heck, they may even end up staying in Aunt Marie's newly relocated trailer! Anyway, they end up battling a legion of Verrat or something equally rough, have a few drinks, and with the combination of alcohol, adrenaline, Trubel never having had a real friend before, and Nick's better judgment being greatly diminished by alcohol....
Whoa. My apologies but this sounds to me like a bad fanficton.
This is the second time you've suggested a scenario in which Nick gets drunk but you're in assumption/speculation territory here because there is no evidence to suggest that Nick is the type to get drunk, true, nor to the contrary but nonetheless you are still speculating here.
Drunkenness aside, the idea that Nick and Trubel could ever sleep together whether under the influence of alcohol or not is just ridiculous. Granted they haven't had enough screen time together to judge their chemistry accurately, in fact I sense none at all, but they most certainly do not have THAT kind of chemistry. He actually treats her like a daughter if anything judging by the episode in which she'd posed as a police ride along. Her street smarts led them to the wesen in question, she knew the entire time what she was doing and it was working but every time she tried to deliver completely valid information Nick wrote her off and tried to keep her on a short leash. When she'd taken it upon herself to go undercover he'd sat there anxiously wanting to reel her in the entire time. It reminded me of the film 'Cheaper by the Dozen 2' in which Steve Martin's 11 year old daughter went on her first date and he'd sat staring at the clock in complete panic mode. He'd gotten so impatient he'd ended up crashing the date. There were actually times when Nick wanted to crash Trubel's undercover operation and only didn't because Hank insisted he give the girl a chance.
So I find the notion of Trubel and Nick being romantic disgusting.
In fact how old is Trubel? I think she could actually barely be a fitting age to be Nick's daughter. He would have had to be an idiot and knock some chick up sometime in high school if he's in his early 30's as his appearance would suggest but the point is, it might work!
If not his daughter than she most certainly passes for his younger sister though I doubt they could make that plausible as an actuality given Nick's father was killed with no second kid present as shown in the flashback when he was left in Aunt Marie's care and Mother B ending up in a life on the run. So I personally hope they don't try.
Either way she is too young for him as a romantic partner.
If she's under 18 it could even be illegal depending on Oregon state laws and since he's a cop it could lose him his credibility and/or his job. Even if state laws don't call sex with a minor 'statutory rape' they'd probably still call it a misdemeanor which also doesn't look good for cop. That's like a squeamish paramedic, it just doesn't work. It's hypocritical.
This is irrelevant though as I am pretty sure she's 18 or 19. Isn't she?
So just no.