03-14-2017, 01:54 PM
Quote:Current laws definitely cover acts of prestidigitation or other trickery and fraud, and the criminal consequences for drugging someone far outweigh the legal ethics issues. But the first time someone comes along who can provably read someone's mind or do anything else that doesn't involve physicality, there's going to be a mad scramble in legislatures around the country to outlaw it, and the first person who does it is likely to get away with it.That is like saying when someone creates a time machine. There will be laws to prevent going into the future to pick wining stocks or horses. The problem is building a time machine to see the future is about as likely as reading minds. It is one thing to being able to detect brain activity. It is another to be able to detect thought. That would be like knowing what a computer is doing by monitoring the cpu. Without context if mends nothing
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one