07-12-2017, 08:05 PM
What I think interesting in all this debate is how people frame the the show to make it fit in their own world view. That sentence is not a criticism to anyone because I know I do it myself.
I am one of those that doesn't see Nick as a corrupt cop because I try to see his intentions in his actions. And what I saw during the show was a man with the hard responsability of knowing something that others didn't know and because of this he had to make choices no one else could do. I saw he trying to do the right thing.
But I see that there are same people in the forum that sees Nick as corrupt because they try to see Nick's actions and not his intentions. They saw that Nick did things in the wrong way.
In the end I think this is the real question here :
Nick choosing to do the right thing but same times choosing a questionable way. Versus. Nick doing things in the right way (following the law procedure) and letting the system follow its path to the final result.
I am one of those that doesn't see Nick as a corrupt cop because I try to see his intentions in his actions. And what I saw during the show was a man with the hard responsability of knowing something that others didn't know and because of this he had to make choices no one else could do. I saw he trying to do the right thing.
But I see that there are same people in the forum that sees Nick as corrupt because they try to see Nick's actions and not his intentions. They saw that Nick did things in the wrong way.
In the end I think this is the real question here :
Nick choosing to do the right thing but same times choosing a questionable way. Versus. Nick doing things in the right way (following the law procedure) and letting the system follow its path to the final result.
“If two people agree on everything, one of them is unnecessary.”
— Attributed to Winston Churchill
— Attributed to Winston Churchill