04-12-2016, 06:31 AM
There have been some recent comments on the forum that the woge is a form of temporary insanity. In Dwight's case, is that true?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.
Poll: Did you like the episode "The Believer"? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Loved it! | 5 | 26.32% | |
Liked it | 10 | 52.63% | |
Meh... | 3 | 15.79% | |
Disliked | 1 | 5.26% | |
Total | 19 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
04-12-2016, 06:31 AM
There have been some recent comments on the forum that the woge is a form of temporary insanity. In Dwight's case, is that true?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.
(04-11-2016, 07:41 PM)syscrash Wrote:Yes Syscrash, you remain a child of God. Indeed some church leaders have committed horrific acts. Yet in spite of those errors, most Christians remain committed to the Lord's command to "feed my sheep." None of your commentary takes away from the good done by Mother Teresa and millions like her. Christians shall continue to feed sheep even those that respond with hatred and attacks.Quote:Hello Syscrash, You may recall from Matthew 7: Quote: 1 "Judge not, that you be not judged.Blessings. New Guy (04-12-2016, 06:28 AM)brandon Wrote: I also think so.I get upset when the Vatican says that unbaptized children can live in heaven. I believe you are speaking of limbo. The concept of limbo was eliminated, I believe, in 2007. (04-12-2016, 06:28 AM)brandon Wrote: who are they to judge well.the Catholic Church in many countries, has concealed pedophile priests case. True. They have. But what you need to remember is that not every single Catholic priest is a pedophile and not every single Catholic parishioner participates in covering it up. There are many fine Catholic people who uphold their faith and live by its principles. There are many priests out there whose only concern is the good of the people. I understand the outrage of some here over the episode. Nick spouted off at the end that he wasn't there to judge. Yet that's pretty much what he did and that makes him a hypocrite. He judged the preacher, the people and their faith immediately from the moment he walked in. So did Hank and Wu. And Grimm, instead of treating this tent revival with respect, turned it into a shambles. The preacher was naturally a fraud and naturally, there'd be a group of radicals who wanted to rid him of the devil, and were naturally going to torture him until they did.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.
04-12-2016, 10:18 AM
(04-12-2016, 09:58 AM)irukandji Wrote: I understand the outrage of some here over the episode. Nick spouted off at the end that he wasn't there to judge. Yet that's pretty much what he did and that makes him a hypocrite. He judged the preacher, the people and their faith immediately from the moment he walked in. So did Hank and Wu. And Grimm, instead of treating this tent revival with respect, turned it into a shambles. The preacher was naturally a fraud and naturally, there'd be a group of radicals who wanted to rid him of the devil. I've come to the conclusion Greenwalt and Kouf share Joss Whedon's less-than-sunny attitude towards religion, which is a shame. I've never been to tent revivals, but there have been times when my own faith provided me a way out of a dark corner that atheism couldn't. On the upside, while the preacher was exposed as a fraud, he made it clear to Nick and Hank that he thought he was putting the faith of his audience to good use, as opposed to merely exploiting it. Sadly, it all backfired in the end.
04-12-2016, 10:50 AM
04-12-2016, 02:22 PM
remembering on witch hat, Elizabeth gave it to Sean and Juliette could take him from the house.He could be Juliette's belongings and took him Hadrian's Wall.
they knew thoroughly clean the house Nick.who knows what else did
04-12-2016, 03:33 PM
(04-12-2016, 02:22 PM)brandon Wrote: remembering on witch hat, Elizabeth gave it to Sean and Juliette could take him from the house.He could be Juliette's belongings and took him Hadrian's Wall. The hat Juliette had was much newer. I don't think she took it from Sean. She also had a different spell book and cauldron. No doubt she obtained these things with help from Meisner.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.
04-13-2016, 12:15 PM
Here is the thing I think the writers screwed up about the hat. Hanks comment of "Are you thinking about smoking that hat again". The last place the hat and book where was in the shop. Hank may have been asking thinking she wanted to use the hat. But then when she said she already tried it. No one even looked surprised or questioned how did she get the hat or a hat.
To me there are many ways the show could have dealt with this. A simple acknowledgement of she has a different hat. They would not even have to say from who or where. She could have said I borrowed the hat to see if it would work. The hat trick still has the epilogue. Maybe they will address it then. But they glossed over it in the prologue when it should have been mentioned. I don't see them bringing it up. unless the how and why has significance. Say, in starting to tell the story of how she became Eve. So far they have only shown day 1 with Meisner. Supposedly they are going to explain about her conversion.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one
04-13-2016, 03:33 PM
For some reason I just don't see Eve using anything of Adalind's.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.
04-14-2016, 05:48 AM
|
|