04-09-2017, 07:45 PM
(04-09-2017, 07:30 PM)Robyn Wrote:(04-09-2017, 07:19 PM)irukandji Wrote: I think I'm confused here. Are you saying you agree Adalind took Nick's Grimm out of revenge for taking Diana?No, absolutely not. Adalind didn't know Nick or the others were even involved when she took Nick's Grimm. She believed Renard when he told her he had to give Diana to Viktor to keep her and himself safe from the Royals.
Because Adalind believed Kelly had left Portland - alone - and couldn't help her get Diana back, she called Viktor and begged him to let her see Diana.
Viktor pretended he actually had Diana, and agreed that Adalind could see her if she took Nick's Grimm.
At that point, Adalind was angry with Renard and if she wanted revenge, it would have been against Renard - not Nick.
So no, Adalind didn't take Nick's Grimm for revenge. She did it so Viktor would allow her to see Diana. If Renard hadn't lied about giving Diana to Viktor, Adalind would not have called Viktor.
If Renard had instead lied that the Resistance came to Portland and took Diana by force, Adalind wouldn't have had any options because she didn't know how to reach anyone in the Resistance.
I'm still not following your logic here. If Adalind didn't take Nick's grimm for revenge why did she tell him she did it because he took Diana?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.