(03-08-2016, 02:26 PM)wfmyers1207 Wrote:(03-08-2016, 02:17 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-08-2016, 02:09 PM)wfmyers1207 Wrote:(03-08-2016, 12:40 PM)irukandji Wrote: Juliette didn't kill Kelly. Beside that, Diana had ample opportunity to kill her the night Kelly did......if she wanted to. The fact that she didn't life a finger to hurt Juliette, and in fact, seemed to like Juliette shows she isn't going to go after her. Nick on the other hand, I have a feeling she might go after him.
Look, I know you and I will never agree on this. But aiding and abetting makes the person who did it just as guilty as the person who "pulls the trigger" or whatever. That is the maxim in both morality and the law.
Juliette lured Kelly in to be murdered. She also provided information to aide and abet the murder of several of her neighbors and this nonsense about "she didn't know they were going to be murdered" is absolute bull. What did she think the werrat were going to do? Throw everyone a surprise block party?
She lied about it to Nick because HW wants and needs him to work with them. Pretty straight forward really.
The only thing Juliette is guilty of in this case is betraying Kelly. You can say she's full of bull until the cows come home but the fact remains, you have no proof she knew Kelly was going to be murdered.
Question: What else could she have possibly thought that the werrat were going to do?
So you're asking her to read minds now, is that it? And aside for that, I keep reading comments that Juliette never understood Nick's world. So you tell me, if the woman didn't understand his world, what would she have thought the verrat were going to do? Would she have even known what verrat were?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.