Quote:NO, NO, NO. I am relying on what I saw on the screen. In my world she is guilty based on the evidence I SAW on the show, not what are the legalities of burden of proof in a courtroom. If you feel she wasn't at fault after seeing the same crap as I did, speaks volumes of your morality.The simple solution is for you to show one place that it acknowledges that she is guilty of killing Kelly. You keep saying "In my world she is guilty based on the evidence I SAW on the show". You hold this position even though the writers do not acknowledge this position. That means either you think they over looked making the point or the writers are wrong. But not only do the writers not acknowledge your position. At many points where they could the guilty acknowledgement, they distance Juliette from the final result. So based on what the writers wrote, Juliette contributions contradicted complicity instead of acknowledging it.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one