06-15-2018, 10:48 AM
(06-15-2018, 09:50 AM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:The world I live in, a mother has the right to get her daughter way above the grandfather of child fathered by his bastard son. I do wish to thank you for pointing this out that in "MY WORLD", YES, Adalind does have that right above a grandfather.Even in the world you live in. Would any judge give Adalind custody if they knew she sold said child. Do you think it would make a difference if she said she changed her mine.
Here we go again. You can't prove your point so you spin it back to a legal argument. I wouldn't know, I am not a judge. I didn't go to Law School. I am not a know-it all.
Like I said on other threads, I saw the first season out of order with episodes of the second season mixed in. My daughter got Amazon Prime, I got access to all 6 seasons and started to watch the seasons and episodes in sequence. Sometimes I got to watch two or three episodes in one sittings, especially at the end of one season into the next.
Unlike the Romans, Vini, Vidi, Vinci, I came, I saw, I conquered. I came home, I saw an episode or two, I digested what I saw and decided I liked the show. I have to admit, the show kinda stands out above most of the stuff I see on the tube but I do enjoy discussing the various views and opinions.
What I don't find intriguing is when someone conflicts with my opinions and when I push back, they make shitz or deflect. Some, based on what they type, you can clearly ascertain they either did not watch the show in its entirety or just purposely deny what they saw. In addition, in your case, you go well beyond analysis with off the wall reasoning in trying to justify a baseless opinion about a bunch of fictional characters on a fantasy show.
I mean, at the end of the day, who gives a shitz? Yea, I have my favorites characters. I have my disliked ones. So what?
You have one demented obsessed contributor with possible psychological issues with the inability to digest the show centered on the Nick character, not Juliette. Then we have YOU, the Ayatollah of Diflectio-ohla. And then, sometimes, you get stupid me, going down a rabbit hole in a wasted discussion, SUCH AS THIS ONE, of valuable time that could be utilized at watching paint dry.
I will try one more time in trying to explain my point of view. We as the viewers get to see His side, Her side and the truth. We also get to see what the conflicting characters do not get to see. We also get to see what a jury, judge, cops will never see. This is why, I say again. Who gives a shitz what can be proven in a courtroom.
What matters is what, YOU, as the viewer sees it. You want to justify what Juliette did as being heroic, righteous, innocent, victimized, promiscuous or even Mother Theresa? Then say so, when confronted with proving your point, use what you got from the show.
WHEN you have to divulge in what you labeled as "writers intent" only proves your opinion has no legs to stand on and you have to resort to being clairvoyant. Your other expert technique, as some amateurs try to use, is deflecting the argument by challenging if my opinion of Juliette's guilt, could be proven in a courtroom.
Again, this action only proves your opinion is baseless so you raise the burden of proof when it is inconsequential.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!