06-14-2018, 08:04 PM
(06-14-2018, 06:18 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:Obviously you have no clue on what it means to have intent and what it means to have results. I don't need you to tell me if she had intent or not. Who gives a shitz if she wasn't aware of what Ken and the Verat agents were planning. Once the neighbors and Kelly were killed, your intent train left the station.
The point your thick skull isn't unable to comprehend is, intent does not matter after the fact. I don't care if she didn't plan on having Kelly killed or the neighbors. She was part of the crew. She was just as guilty as Kenneth, the Verat agents and even the king.
Can you really be that stupid as not to see she was part of the conspiracy? Are you able to comprehend it does not matter on the intent, its the results that proves her guilt not her expectations? She was part of the gang of criminals that committed the crimes. Then you have the nerve to say I am biased? Ok, if I am biased, WTF are you? Cuckoo?
Your entire rant about results negates intent is flawed. What about Involuntary manslaughter. Someone is dead such as in a car accident. But because of the lack of intent it is not murder. There is also a lack of reasonable expectation.
The only thing we where shown including the guns, the information, contacting Kelly, was a plan to get Diana. Bias is calling the Royals a criminal gang. When actually they are defined as a monarchy that has aristocratic rule.
This was very interestingQuote: She was just as guilty as Kenneth, the Verat agents and even the king.Yet you say you do not have a bias.
You do realize the person you want to be seen as the victim is a hired killer, that kidnapped Diana in the first place. Again this is all because of a bias you have. You argue Nick and Kelly where wrong for taking Diana from her mother. But you demonize the grandfather for getting Diana back.
Look, I don't know what hole you have crawled out from by making all these excuses for the criminals in question. This is what you loosers do. once you are faced with incredible proof in front of you that disdain your opinion you spin it and make the guilt of your character Juliette into, if her guilt can be proven in a court of law.
When did this become an LAW argument about being proved in a courtroom. I live in the USA and just in this country alone, we have various laws that differ between the 50 state. Then you take this Forum with a world wide audience access from various countries with much more varied laws then just the 50 states. Yet, you have the audacity to turn this argument into a legal debate? Are you that ignorant?
Even if we do limit the laws that pertain just Portland, Oregon. You don't have the legal degree, well I know I don't, maybe your genius mind has that too. Meanwhile, who gives a shitz. This is about us, as viewers and how we ascertain what a fictional character does on a fictional show, based on our morals.
I will point out how I can justify my statement about you. Do you read your own posts?
(06-14-2018, 06:18 PM)syscrash Wrote: ]You also demonize the King who was trying to get his granddaughter. But justify Adalind trying to get her daughter.
The world I live in, a mother has the right to get her daughter way above the grandfather of child fathered by his bastard son. I do wish to thank you for pointing this out that in "MY WORLD", YES, Adalind does have that right above a grandfather.
Then you add to it how I,
Quote: But you demonize the grandfather for getting Diana back.Hey, Mr. writers intent, what was the motive for the king to get possession of his granddaughter? Was it from keeping her from harm? Was it to return her back to her dad Sean? Or do you see it as him returning Diana back to Adalind?
What I saw as the King's motive was to ingratiate his standing on the world's stage. All the king cared about was what was in it for HIM! He used up his sons, wife, mistress nephews and as many Verat agents he could pay off, Humans or Wesen alike. Just a few more FACTS you seem to unable to comprehend from the twisted world you come from.
It is so obvious, even by your own words, how you are able to show the differences between my morals and the lack of yours and not even realizing it. Ciao cretino!
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!