02-03-2018, 03:13 PM
(02-03-2018, 09:26 AM)Henry of green Wrote:(02-03-2018, 09:05 AM)irukandji Wrote: This thread has nothing to do with the shows creators or Nick being a grimm. It asks the question, whose acts were worse, Adalind's or Juliette's? For me, it's Nick and Adalind because they did something Juliette didn't. They passed their bad ways on to their children.
Yes but your missing the point what Nick does hunting bad wesen in the show is considered heroic to you it’s heinous but in the show it’s not heinous you can deny it until your blue in the face but Nick is a hero in this grimm world, what Diania and kelly are doing at the end is considered heroic not heinous in the show. You are perfectly entitled to think of it as heinous but the show says differently. It’s your opinion that thier passing on thier bad ways, in the shows narrative Nick is a hero so passing on his ways on the show at least is considered good not bad.
I'll tell you what. Since there are those having such a hissy about Nick being involved, let's go back to the original question. For me, the answer is Adalind because she didn't seek a better life for her children. Instead, she passed on her evil to them. You may think her heroic, but I don't see anything heroic in that at all.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.