Quote:Robyn wrote:
This is Grimm and everything is about Nick. Six characters died in the finale, and their deaths were ultimately about Nick’s drama/Nick’s climatic fight. So of course Diana was referring to Nick in the flash-forward scene, because characters can’t be good guys or on the Grimm team unless they live and breath for Nick. On the show it isn’t necessary for Diana to soften and mature, it’s only necessary for her to be loyal to Nick, the Grimm. This show has never devoted time and energy to character evolution, it doesn’t peel back the layers because there aren’t any layers, characters are simply who/what a particular story or scene needs them to be.
Haha, good post, Robyn. I got a few laughs out of it. You know, I was thinking about baby Kelly and the argument of Adalind being a good mother. Recently, all I have seen with regard to Kelly is a little bundle strapped in his carseat. Every once in a while the camera pans to him to prove to the audience that, "yes, Virginia there is a baby Kelly and yes, he is still alive".
However, just because he's present does that make Adalind a good mother? I got lamblasted for even stating as much because no one wants to see Adalind continually changing a diaper or Adalind worrying over a sick baby or Adalind feeding him.
However, we had a milestone in reality with our own grandbaby, who is learning to crawl. I was watching her yesterday and it was just so wonderful to see something like that because this is a baby. No one can teach her to crawl. She's doing it herself.
And this morning, it brought me back to Kelly, the bundle in the carseat in the corner. It's not necessary for me to see Adalind change a diaper or comfort a sick baby. But Adalind never got the joys of seeing a baby do things for itself with Diana. I felt a little air go out of the "Adalind is great mother balloon" seeing her pass up the joy of watching Kelly do things for himself for the first time.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.