04-07-2017, 01:42 PM
(04-07-2017, 01:41 PM)Circe27 Wrote:(04-07-2017, 01:39 PM)irukandji Wrote:(04-07-2017, 01:37 PM)Circe27 Wrote:(04-07-2017, 01:33 PM)irukandji Wrote:(04-07-2017, 01:32 PM)Circe27 Wrote: So it's ok to kidnap a child if the parent is poor?
She's not poor she's homeless with no means of support. That is according to the recent comments I've read.
She was homeless the day she told Nick about Kelly. When she had Diana, she was with Renard until she was moved for safety reasons. Renard wanted to keep Adalind and the baby with him.
But either way, that's not an excuse to kidnap a child. That's a reason to help a mother and newborn out.
She apparently was homeless when she went to Austria to get Diana. She was still homeless when she flew back home to sleep with Nick. Still homeless, she flew back to Austria to report mission accomplished. She had no way of caring for either child, but insists on keeping both of them. That's nuts.
If they hadn't kidnapped Diana, she wouldn't have been homeless. She left Renard because he helped take Diana away. Again, if they didn't kidnap Diana, she wouldn't have gone to Austria.
Apparently she didn't have a home when she returned to America with Kelly. Otherwise she wouldn't have been staying with Nick.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.