(04-07-2017, 05:01 AM)irukandji Wrote:(04-06-2017, 10:26 PM)Hell Rell Wrote: You weren't using what Adalind could do to get Nick as a hypothetical. You presented your thoughts like that was what actually happened on the show. That's what I was disagreeing with in my argument and wondering how Adalind had a scheme to take Nick away from Juliette.
I can guarantee you that this is not a diversion tactic. You're making up a narrative of Adalind going to Nick for anything other than protection. I'm pointing out how there has been nothing in the show to support it.
This was really about you saying people were unconcerned about Adalind attempting to kill Marie when no one did. Saying I'm trying to create a diversion is another misrepresentation.
As for the topic at hand, I'm one of the people who has said that Adalind did rape Nick. I'm not some Adalind apologist just for anyone who may think that, not including you on this one.
I'm not denying I said it. I did. But if you're presenting an argument about misrepresentation, then you need to include all of the statements of misrepresentation. Otherwise you yourself are guilty of misrepresentation. I know there's at least another in this thread and probably more than that if I go back which I am not going to do. Aside from that there are hundreds in the forum to which you have never raised any objection. You seem to be ignoring that fact and focusing on mine and mine alone. That is not being objective or fair.
You're ticked at what's being said about an imaginary character in an imaginary show where everyone here, not just me, is including their thoughts and their perceptions, true or not.
I have raised objections with other posters. You're not the only person I reply to in this thread.
In this case, I said you misrepresented what others have said by showing what you said. I can't be guilty of misrepresentation by quoting what you said. It was a false statement. That can't be denied.
For the record, I am not nor have I been ticked. I didn't lose any sleep last night. Raising an argument doesn't make me angry. I'm not fuming at the mouth over this imaginary character in this imaginary show. That statement you just made is the biggest misconception here.
I'll take the blame for it getting to this point. This shouldn't have even gotten to the point where you could possibly think I was ticked off.
(04-06-2017, 08:57 PM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: My impression was that Juliette-turned-hexenbiest didn't care whether anyone was going to be hurt or killed until she actually had to hear it happening, and that was when guilt started to seep into her thoughts. Not soon enough for her to actually do something to stop it, though.
I get the same impression. I remember discussing her pointing Nick's gun on Monroe and there was a debate on whether she tried to kill him or not. I don't think she knew Hank would shove him out the way and she didn't take another shot. She just said that was close and found it entertaining. I don think she was determined to kill him but I believe she didn't care whether the bullet him or not.