03-31-2017, 08:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2017, 08:21 AM by MarylikesGrimm.)
(03-31-2017, 08:10 AM)irukandji Wrote:(03-31-2017, 08:09 AM)Circe27 Wrote: I think it's more a hypothetical question of "would he' then actually trying to change the past.
Exactly right. Rather than dredging up the rape again, I wanted to look at it from a different perspective.
(03-31-2017, 08:06 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: Changing the past = time travel = doing it over again
I know what I was asking and why. Time travel had nothing to do with it.
No, I do not understand you. Nick would have to go do it all over again since he did not time travel. If Nick was the same Nick why would anything change?
(03-31-2017, 08:09 AM)Circe27 Wrote: I think it's more a hypothetical question of "would he' then actually trying to change the past.
If you want to invent fantasy place where time travel has different rules than you need to state your fantasy rules. Grimm states it's fantasy rules.
Women characters do not have to be having sex with the lead to be important to the story.