(03-31-2017, 08:00 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-31-2017, 07:51 AM)irukandji Wrote:(03-31-2017, 07:18 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-31-2017, 07:09 AM)irukandji Wrote:(03-31-2017, 06:52 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: Nick and Adalind both love Kelly. Time travel to change the past is dangerous so imo against changing it on such a large scale. You are right that if Nick allows Kelly to be kidnapped he could be turned to evil. If Nick can time travel why stop Kelly from being kidnapped which is much safer than stopping someone from being born who was meant to be.
How many lives should Nick disrupt or end to justify baby Kelly?
Time travel to stop important events is dangerous. Physicist who talk about the theory say it would take huge amounts energy to change events from what was suppose to happen.
How many lives should Nick disrupt or end to stop baby Kelly?
Who's talking about time travel? I certainly wasn't. My question was simply a 'what if Nick could do it all over again would he?' question.
In order to be able to change the past, you required time travel.
No..........that was not my intent. You're reading more into the question.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.