02-13-2017, 09:00 AM
(02-12-2017, 07:00 PM)speakeasy Wrote: Now that's a disqualifier, imo. If we could foresee all the future there would be no need to make decisions. Plus it may have been that the assassination of Kelly's husband and dear friend was necessary in order that she go on the run and give over her son for her sister to raise. Thereby assuring his safety so that he could be at the time and place to fulfill the prophecy we talk about on this forum. I could construct a similar argument about her answering Juliette's urgent request that she come and rescue her son - thereby rushing to her own date with death and setting off a chain of events that placed Diana at the same time and place as Nick and the others to keep an appointment with destiny.This is well thought out post to get us to the prophecy part of season 6. Rereading this from season 3 adds to your point.
Listen to me, both of you.
This child has an extraordinary destiny.
In the wrong hands, it could do great evil.
But in the right hands, it could do great good.
So we're talking, like, "changing the course of history" kind of a person.
Look, I know how it sounds, but personalities appear in the world who people follow.
There's no rational explanation why.
Maybe it's not a coincidence that you brought.
Adalind and her baby back here to Nick.
- I'm sorry, what? - Carl jung, synchronicity.
When two or more events aren't necessarily causally related but are connected through meaning.
I don't care how this is connected.
If Adalind has her powers back, she's not gonna be doing that kid any good, so as far as I'm concerned, the sooner we get her and her destiny to the Resistance, the better.
Nick, that's not gonna work either.
Mom, you've been doing this whole thing for the Resistance.
The child can't belong to the Resistance or the Royals.
She has to have a normal childhood, inasmuch as that's possible.
How she is raised will make all the difference in who she becomes.