12-05-2018, 10:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2018, 04:00 AM by Henry of green.)
(12-05-2018, 09:43 PM)irukandji Wrote:(12-05-2018, 07:08 PM)N_grimm Wrote: Oh, in the past, you have commented on things I've written to others. In post 359, you commented on something I wrote to henry of green. I have never asked why, and I have never put you in quotes - whatever that means… I guess you have special rules. It will not happen again.
From your post, I get the impression you feel you're responding because you feel you have something of merit to add to the discussion. It makes me wonder why you'd pose such an offbeat question then.
You know, you and henry are a lot alike when it comes to these interviews. When it comes to forum debates, you both are often quick to accuse me of ignoring what you both at times consider pertinent. There are many, many interviews on the internet. I have yet to read anything from either of you pointing out that there are differences between them. Instead you both hone in on what you feel makes your point and throw out all the rest, as with the "happily ever after" interview.
I brought up the interview I did because it is different from what Hell Rell stated, yet it is a valid interview. If you or henry wishes to contradict the interview, please knock yourselves out. But in the end, neither you nor henry, for all of your posturing, can deny it. So you choose to ignore it.
I continue to stand by my word that interviews have no credence because here's absolute proof that there are three interviews on the same finale, yet all three are different.
By the way, you know as well as I do that when Kouf stated they all worked together as a family, he wasn't saying, "oh that means only Monroe, Rosalee, Eve, Renard, Wu and Hank. Nick and Adalind are no longer part of the team because after all, they are mom and dad". That in itself is an insane interpretation.
(12-05-2018, 07:08 PM)N_grimm Wrote: Not an old book? Have you seen it? What you call speculation, I call reasonable interpretation.
Really? Maybe Nick wished upon his staff and had a book conjured up for Kelly.
How are the interviews that different they’re not countinuty holds throughout all 3 interviews it’s just some of the questions are slightly different in each interview, in all three interviews they state the gang are working together because they were asked that question. In the two interviews in which they indicate Nick and Adalind are togther and are the mom and dad in the trailer scene they are just simply directly responding to the questions they are being asked.
Why exactly does Nick and Adalind being the mom and dad prevent the rest of the gang from working together on cases It doesn’t your once again coming up with another straw man argument.
G&ks exact words
At the end of the final episode, we get the sense that Nick and Adalind are still together. Is that fair?
JK and DG: Yes, that's fair.
If the writers truly wanted it to be ambiguous wether Nick and Adalind were still togther they simply could have responded to the above question by saying it’s a possibility thier still togther or its up to the fans but they didn’t they give a difinitive yes stating it’s a fair statment to say thier still togther.
And obviously Monroe and Rosalee had the triplets, and are - hopefully - still together.
JK and DG: Yup.
G&k are then asked about the some of the other characters apart from Adalind and Nick and Monroe and Rosalee
What happened with some of our other characters? What happened with Renard and Eve and Trubel?
DG: Whatever you think happened to them
How exactly are they not separating the rest of the group from Nick and Adalind during the interview.