(11-24-2018, 01:52 PM)irukandji Wrote: You said Nick as written and portrayed was a social person. He needed people around him he could trust. So tell me. Where are all of the old friends Nick, the social person, could trust? For that matter where are the new friends? All I saw at the end were the kids. And if you take Diana's statement to heart, then Nick is no longer just hunting the bad ones. His group is killing wesen.
Let me see if I get this right: When answering questions about what happened to the other characters in Grimm, except Nick, Adalind, Kelly, Diana and the triplets, the writers said they didn’t have time to include that in the ending. But you think they should include new friends Nick met in the future, and use their absence as proof that he didn’t have friends? Excuse me while I bang my head against the wall.
(11-24-2018, 02:00 PM)irukandji Wrote: Diana did not get Nick back because she had an emotional connection with him. She got him back for Adalind. You keep trying to piece things together to establish some kind of an emotional connection between them and it just isn't there.
Why the heck shouldn't Diana bond with Nick? In addition to what the other contributors have said, I just want to remind you that Nick rescued Diana from Z. It was only Nick that could save her from a horrible fate. I'm sure she never forgot.
(11-24-2018, 02:25 PM)irukandji Wrote: No, Nick was corrupt before he murdered Kenneth. He was corrupt after he murdered Kenneth. The thing with Nick is that because he performs a good act here and there, the bad acts, even murder, are overlooked.
I have never seen a crime or superhero series where the detectives or heroes always follows the law. Grimm was about a man who had to balance being a cop with being a Grimm. Nick fights against evil monsters and villains that can only be defeated with untraditional methods. But keep telling yourself that Nick is evil and the villains are heroes.