01-01-2017, 12:55 PM
(01-01-2017, 11:54 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:(01-01-2017, 09:42 AM)irukandji Wrote:We always agree to disagree because of how we each view the series. Not a problem I know you see it as it should hold true law and order so you are correct from you view, I see it as a fantasy as such Nick was right in doing what he did. Just different views.(01-01-2017, 08:10 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: We can debate all episode with what if's, but these are alway a personal view of the characters. The frog girl is a good debate on the what ifs but the girl wanted the change no one forced her to drink the potion. The real debate would this make her happy she said it did. Could the whole point of episode have been there is someone out there for everyone. The guy she was with at the end thought she was beautiful so the episode had a happy ever after ending. Like any fairy tale.
The only problem with the happy ending scenario is that it is not a happy ending for at least two people, who ended up dead. What I am saying is that the episode was contrived from the minute it aired until its conclusion. It was designed to supposedly show "another side to Nick". In reality, it didn't show that at all. Accident or not, the frog girl killed two men. Anyone else accidentally killing two men would have to face the judge and a jury. Nick took it upon himself to see to it that the frog girl was not going down that path. Who's he to make that decision?
Well, even fantasies have their rules. For instance, we know it is wrong to kill in Grimm, the series has made that very plain. So it's safe to assume there is some kind of law in force.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.