03-15-2017, 03:30 PM
(03-15-2017, 03:21 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-15-2017, 03:15 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-15-2017, 03:08 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-15-2017, 03:02 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-15-2017, 03:00 PM)irukandji Wrote: You're saying Nick going back to being a grimm was *just as* dangerous as Nick stating he didn't want to do anything and be a human. That means he was no better off if he became a grimm or remained human.
If one is as dangerous as the other, that means Adalind's spell had consequences *besides* taking Nick's grimm away.
Yes, it has side effects but death was not seen as likely.
So what you're saying is Elizabeth was not helping Nick, but helping Sean? In other words then, she deliberately kept Juliette's side effects secret in order to deceive Nick into becoming a Grimm?
Yes, imo she down played the side effects and never offered any suggests to help Juliette even though Sean.
Well, that's why we differ. That theory has been brought up before. It's an interesting theory, but as far as I remember, no one could find any facts to substantiate it.
Sean sold Elizabeth the idea of giving Nick his Grimm back so he could protect Diana who his mother was taking care of.
Women characters do not have to be having sex with the lead to be important to the story.