08-12-2015, 05:54 PM
(08-12-2015, 03:29 PM)wfmyers1207 Wrote: But he did not actually harm her and announced that he would not do so! In law and morality that ends any fault he may have had, and she was then acting under her own volition for her own reasons. I know you are this big Juliette partisan irukandji. But in the end she WAS a homicidal b*&^ch!
She was made so by circumstances; the argument might be made she was insane at the time. But that doesn't negate how dangerous she was to herself and others.
One does not shoot a mad dog to punish it for having rabies; one does so to keep it from biting someone.