12-18-2017, 03:31 PM
Quote:No amount of anger justifies violent acts that lead to people dying. Juliette had every right to be angry, but expressing that anger in the manner that we saw is unacceptable. In the real world, you do what Juliette did, set someone's property on fire, conspire with your neighbours' killers resulting in the unexpected death of your potential mother in law, no court would acquit you of the guilt/responsibility of your actions. The Bible says in eph 4:26As for the trailer. Could Nick press charges yes. But in most cases it becomes a civil matter where the person is made to pay for the property damage. As for the neighbors you are projecting when you put that on Juliette. As I said before you are assuming she knew what you as a viewer knows. Remember until the attack on Kelly she had never seen any thing that would make her think Kenneth was violent. She never heard any warning of Kenneth being violent. As viewers we had seen plenty. Not only people talking about how violent he was. We watched him beat up Sean's spy. We saw him beat up Sean. We watch him take over the neighbors houses. None of which Juliette had any knowledge of. You like other keep wanting to equate her anger with the deaths. The only thing her anger did was to help make sure Adalind did not get Diana. What I think is interesting. Had Juliette not been a hexenbiest it would have been Adalind working with Kenneth. The difference Adalind would have more the likely helped. Where Juliette was duped.
I have seen other find fault with her because she did not help Kelly once she realized what was happening. They forget Kenneth and the Royals where her only avenue for help since she could not longer turn to her so called friends. Why would she bite the hand that feeds her. Even though in the end she could not go along with them and abandoned their help.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one