(04-25-2017, 07:00 PM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote: It is being debated in this forum about the characters if they are good or bad. If who are the hero and who aren't the hero.
With the end of the show I would like to use this debate to ask each one how do you see the way the writers used an opened for interpretation world view in a way that each one of us were able to see the characters in different ways.
For exemple, many of us see Nick as the hero of the show while others see him as just a corrupted cop.
Personally, I would point out the fact that Nick apparently always choose his own grimm interests in place of his oath as a cop. Can this selfish view (as a way to speak) be seeing as trend in all characters of the show?
I think Bud was the one outstanding person of character. Given his genetic demeanor I think he exhibited stalwart bravery. He stepped out of genetic character to try and bring a vote at his lodge, he always could be counted on, I do not see where the choices Bud made really were always in his own best interest, especially given the genetic predisposition he possesses. So I do not see bud as selfish.
Oxford commas are so totally rad!.