(12-05-2016, 08:49 AM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote:(12-05-2016, 08:19 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:(12-05-2016, 07:32 AM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote: @irukandji you have just made great comments about how the show underestimate the viewers considering how the writers deals with rules of the universe of the show. That was just what I was looking for when I posted this thread.Question would we have use the metaphysical laws in Grmm? So what are those laws or are there any at all?
Just a thought. You posted about the impossibility of the woge and the transformations of the characters in other person like Adelaind in Juliette and Eve in Sean. Where is the mass for that?
I think one big hole there was when the writers tryed to give a like science explanation for wesen like the DNA mixed constitution and grimm eyes thing and so on. Why didn't they use only magic for that? If the wesen were only magical or mythical creatures don't you think that would be less inconsistent?
I would have go by pure magic explanations. I thiknk the writers should have created their own rules. What do you think?
Although I was not asked my opinion, given the camaraderie we share I doubt you will oppose me leaping into the fray, as it were.
I always liked the explanation that magic is simply a scientific understanding that one person or group stumbles upon and/or understands and another does not.
I prefer explanations that simply fudge the limits of known science or dwell on the edge of the theoretical.
In many ways I would enjoy an ending of Grimm that reveals it was all just a dream and Nick is animal control officer or something. Then the show can reveal who the rest of the cast were suppose to be in real life. It has been done before, but then again so has almost every plot line of this show.
Oxford commas are so totally rad!.