(12-06-2018, 06:33 PM)N_grimm Wrote:(12-06-2018, 06:22 PM)Henry of green Wrote: N Grimm don’t be silly, Eric Renard is the dad in the epilogue he rose from the dead glued himself back together after Miesner blow him into a million pieces and claimed his true hexenbastard daughter Diana. He then decided the to raise her to carry on Nicks families Grimm family legacy instead of his Royal one. You know what that probably makes more sense than Sean Renard choosing of his own accord to raise Diana to be a Grimm carrying on Nicks family legacy without having any influence from Nick himself.
Of course! Why didn’t I think of that?
Seriously, perhaps the spin-off will kill this discussion once and for all.
Unfortunately, it won't. It can confirm Nick and Adalind remained together after defeating Z but that won't matter unless it's stated and shown that they're still together after the epilogue.
You know that argument is coming. The show could go on for 10 years but still won't be conclusive if it doesn't address the time following the epilogue.
(12-06-2018, 07:55 PM)irukandji Wrote:Quote:[quote='Henry of green' pid='73804' dateline='1544149815']
The interview did confirm it your just far to biased to accept it you’d make an excuse no matter what the writers said.
I seem to recall that you, on several occasions, stated that everyone has a right to their own opinion. Do you still believe that everyone has a right to their opinion, or only a right to your opinion?
Regarding the use of fair, what would you have said if they responded to the interviewer by saying that it wasn't fair. Would you still say that it was ambiguous?