Diana and Kelly going to take care of some wesen being compared to Adalind handing over baby Diana to honor a contract her hand was forced upon are two different things. That's such a false equivalency.
Adalind decided to sell Diana before she was born because she wasn't real to her yet. She may have saw her as a bargaining chip until she gave birth to the living, breathing baby and held her in her arms. Adalind realized she could not give that child up because now she's no longer a bargaining chip but a living being who she cares very much for now. And I don't see what's wrong with her growing a conscience and making a different decision.
In terms of legacy, I wasn't aware giving away babies was part of the Hexenbiest lore.
I may be misinterpreting this because of the way you're phrasing this so I'll ask you to clarify. Do you believe Diana and Kelly are out there killing wesen indiscriminately?
Adalind decided to sell Diana before she was born because she wasn't real to her yet. She may have saw her as a bargaining chip until she gave birth to the living, breathing baby and held her in her arms. Adalind realized she could not give that child up because now she's no longer a bargaining chip but a living being who she cares very much for now. And I don't see what's wrong with her growing a conscience and making a different decision.
In terms of legacy, I wasn't aware giving away babies was part of the Hexenbiest lore.
(05-17-2017, 04:42 AM)irukandji Wrote: You were the one who argued with me about Nick's murderous children killing wesen because of they're sticking to their Grimm heritage, yet you're completely outraged at the same mother making a deal to obtain a hexenbiest spirit in exchange for her baby and I say she should have kept her end of the bargain?
I may be misinterpreting this because of the way you're phrasing this so I'll ask you to clarify. Do you believe Diana and Kelly are out there killing wesen indiscriminately?