03-15-2017, 01:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-15-2017, 01:28 PM by MarylikesGrimm.)
(03-15-2017, 01:18 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-15-2017, 12:59 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-15-2017, 12:28 PM)irukandji Wrote: Well, whatever it means, it still comes down to a potentially fatal outcome because of Adalind.
Everyone was surprised by the severe side effect of Juliette being a hexenbiest so IMO no one expecting anyone to die. Other than headaches, visions problems and becoming a father Nick had no known side effects from losing his grimm. Baby Kelly could have a side effect we have not seen yet.
Juliette and Nick were already pretty much decided that Nick was not going back to being a grimm. If the danger was simply a few headaches here and there, Elizabeth wouldn't have said anything because it would have made no difference. And that's my point. Elizabeth was cautioning against doing nothing. That means she suspected some kind of danger to Nick in the long run.
I do not agree she used "just as" not more. Elizabeth knew that Nick being a Grimm benefited Sean her son so her point was it was no more dangerous to get his powers back so Nick would want to do it.
Elizabeth was not neutral and she was a hexenbiest herself.
Women characters do not have to be having sex with the lead to be important to the story.