11-01-2013, 09:04 PM
(11-01-2013, 08:37 PM)Lou Wrote: This was another episode that had Nick (and us) exploring the ethics of being a Grimm/Policeman. Grimm ethics seem to take precedence - but just barely.My only problem with this is that, considering all the blatant criminal crap he's done the past two seasons (e.g., lying to the FBI, murdering the Raub-kondor in cold blood, covering up the murder of Edgar Waltz, etc.) , this is what he's going to throw a hissy fit about. Really? The one time he's clearly innocent? LOL.
(11-01-2013, 08:37 PM)Lou Wrote: I think the cover story couldn't really stand up to serious questioning. But we weren't shown when the Grimmsters worked out those details Renard spoke of (probably because it would have been tedious and pointless) .Oh, the story would be torn apart by even some of the most mediocre cops. Hell, if I'm questioning one of the witnesses at a murder scene, and her boyfriend suddenly drops a coffee cup in the middle of the interrogation? Total red flag. And why didn't they bother to ask Nick where he was last night? If she was a witness, why wasn't he also one?
(11-01-2013, 08:37 PM)Lou Wrote: With Eric dead (dollars to donuts, he comes back), is Adalind's baby worth more or less?I'll take that bet. The problem with bringing James Frain back is that he's a pretty popular actor right now (see his upcoming appearance in Sleepy Hollow, for instance). So, at best, the Grimm writers may only be able to get him for a single episode. If they're going to kill him offscreen right now, you might as well just leave him dead if that's all you have to work with. Hell, that's the reason they killed him off to begin with. He couldn't work out his schedule to return to Grimm.