05-07-2017, 06:54 AM
(05-07-2017, 05:56 AM)speakeasy Wrote: No, it's not about the flash-card pace that Nick moved from shock to acceptance, that's what it's about for you.How one is to discuss a character without examining his/her evolution escapes me. Speakeasy, you seem to simply want to gush about how perfect the show and characters are and dismiss any gaping holes that would impede your gushing. That’s your prerogative, just as it’s another’s prerogative to explore a need for the gaping holes to be filled.
I don't agree with any part of your post. This thread is about Kelly, Nick's mother. It's not solely about character development, character development, character development - and why that all-important part of the show's biography is lacking for just about every character to some viewers. I am fine with the big hole left by the lack of character development by the creators and writers of the program. In spite of it, I somehow managed to get alot of enjoyment out of the programming of Grimm.
Of course the writers were leaving out a big tearful, episodes-long saga about the cause of Nick's separation from his mother. We are supposed to accept it and get on with the subjects at hand. But some posters insist on crucifying just about every character we saw in the series with vituperous and outlandish critiques about far too many aspects of the entire show. A few posters around here seem bent on proving this particular program was aimed at corrupting society. It's weird, imo.
Discussions threads are here for the making. You can easily start a thread that’s only about how good the show is and make participation contingent on posters agreeing with you. I can assure you that I will not intrude on your discussion.
"If my devils are to leave me, I am afraid my angels will take flight as well." Rainer Maria Rilke