Kwu9888 Your opinion is emotional but has no legal foundation.
legally Juliette is not an accessory to the murder. She is an accomplice after the fact. There is no law that says you have to intervene to stop a crime. You are not even legally required to report a crime. You also can not be convicted on what you should have known. Example you are sitting in a car. your friends go in the store and come out with beer. You can not be convicted of stealing the beer even if you knew they had no money. You could only be convicted if they said they where going to steal the beer. Just saying they where going to get beer does not count.
The most Juliette could be convicted of is planing the kidnapping and being an accomplice after the fact. She could never be convicted of murder.
Compared to Nick killing Kenneth which was premeditated. He planted evidence. Then used his authority as an officer. To commit murder. Where Juliette would get time. Nick would be eligible for the death penalty.
legally Juliette is not an accessory to the murder. She is an accomplice after the fact. There is no law that says you have to intervene to stop a crime. You are not even legally required to report a crime. You also can not be convicted on what you should have known. Example you are sitting in a car. your friends go in the store and come out with beer. You can not be convicted of stealing the beer even if you knew they had no money. You could only be convicted if they said they where going to steal the beer. Just saying they where going to get beer does not count.
The most Juliette could be convicted of is planing the kidnapping and being an accomplice after the fact. She could never be convicted of murder.
Compared to Nick killing Kenneth which was premeditated. He planted evidence. Then used his authority as an officer. To commit murder. Where Juliette would get time. Nick would be eligible for the death penalty.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one