01-18-2018, 05:17 AM
(01-17-2018, 05:38 PM)syscrash Wrote: In every story read from the book. There was one thing in common. The wesen being talked about had killed someone. That does not mean that there where not Grimms that killed wesen out of a prejudice against wesen. According to the stories a number of them the Grimm observed that it was part of what allowed them to survive or for some other none malicious reason. Some of the stories even pointed out it was a defense mechanism. But no matter the reason the result was the Grimm killed the wesen. From what Kelly and Mari said, I got the impression that their family would hunt certain wesen because of what they could do not because of what that wesen had done. For example they knew Blutbod had a habit of hinting humans so if they ran into a blutbod they would kill them thinking if they hadn't they would kill someone.
This idea of doing preventive kills was the point of the episode where the wesen would kill kids he know where going to grow to be killers. Basically it was a version of the minority report. They problem with any discussion about the morality of that practice is, it is not possible to determine what the future holds. What make the argument even worse is if you examine all the possibilities beyond the single point. what if you could determine someone would be a killer. So you kill them. What if by killing them prevents this person from killing someone even worse then they are.
So grimms perform proactive murder of men, woman and children because of the possibility these wesen might kill humans. That sounds like a lot of prejudice to me.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.