05-09-2019, 09:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-09-2019, 09:32 PM by dicappatore.)
(05-09-2019, 08:11 PM)syscrash Wrote:(05-08-2019, 04:36 AM)dicappatore Wrote: I do wish, for entertainment purposes, for you "Fake Contributors" to come up with some new creative twists. These same old, same old stuff is getting boring.
I can not speak for you . But in my opinion your beliefs and ideas are based on societal opinion. Me like other look at things objectively.
Example many state Adalind and Juliette sexual activities prove they are promiscuous. As I have pointed out now days many consider sex no different then any other activity. It is like the argument i have with people that tow same sex people kissing does not make them gay.
The same is true with how many speak of other immoralities in the show. Take body counts. there are many post arguing the right or wrong. Forgetting this is a story about characters that on a daily bases live in a life or death situation. these are characters where justice is eye for and eye. Yet posters want to compare it with if the characters where friends or neighbors.
But no the post are not fake, we just don't live or lives based on the dogma that most take on faith as being true.
First off, please note, sometimes I am a bit ambiguous with my sarcasm. That aside, my only critique of your interpretations on how you formulate your opinion is your knack to make things a lot more complicated. Now there is nothing wrong on interpreting a different side of view, including additional complications.
The problem I have with your reasoning of your interpretative opinions are, as you claim, to have the insight of writers intent which you base on how you formulate your opinions.
Now your method would be very believable if you were part of the creative team, a member of the cast, a contributing writer or an occasional director but you aren't.
The reality of the Grimm Series is that it is a simple 40 minute per episode entertaining show. Besides those limitations, its lack of an astronomical budget added more limits on the simplification and less complicated story line, including the various arcs. I hate to use GoT again, as a comparison, but those episodes were or are, more like a one and a half hour movie.
In other words, your writers intent theory is just a fancy term for "guessing". Not even an educated guess. Just plain guessing.
Now, as for my critique to the other, so called, "Fake Contributor". The same applies, but I would remove the "writers intent" term and replace it with "unimaginative twisted fiction".
(05-09-2019, 04:19 AM)irukandji Wrote: Yes, let's have yet another discussion to rehash Monroe's last name. Maybe this time he can be connected to the Tupperware dynasty. At the very least it might go further than it did the last time it was brought up......again.
As I recall it, my old rant about Monroe's last name, was in reply to a new contributor’s inquiry about the subject. If I am wrong, i don't give a hoot. You can Squawk about it to your hearts content but as usual your lack-luster imaginative concoctions says one thing for sure, you are consistent on fake facts.
On the other hand, I am surprised those postings left such an impression on you. How shocking was it to you, on how I made an argument based on facts from the actual show, instead of concocting baseless imaginative scenes or dialogue?
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!