(07-08-2015, 04:50 AM)irukandji Wrote: I should have phrased this question differently. Juliette wasn't the first character to be killed off during this season. Sean was also killed. Should he have remained dead? If not, why not?
One, I not think they ever should have killed Renard the first time, having him shot would have been enough. I really do not like too many fantasy elements in a show.. I am prepared to accept the whole wesen/grimm thin. As mentioned I don't really like the Royal thing, the Chavez, thing, the keys etc. You have more than enough things to flesh out with the basic premise of the series without all this "Lord of the Rings" stuff being thrown in.
I prefer when you kill someone that they stay dead. I think killing and bringing Renard back hurt the show. I agree that he is needed and a strong part of the show, so they never should have killed him off in the first place.
IMNTBMFHO, there are simply too many moving parts in the show. Maybe that leads to a higher audience number so it is necessary, but I believe it detracts from the quality of the character development.
My vote (as if I have one) is when you kill a character off they remain dead. Emotionalize the event, show how it impacts the other characters etc, in that way they sort of live on, but keep the dead, dead.
(07-08-2015, 08:39 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: He ordered her death, js. Do you really believe he didn't mean it?No he did mean it but back to love the emotion who and how we love doesn't always makes sense. How we fall in or out love doesn't always make sense either.
[/quote]
Very astute. : )