04-25-2017, 07:00 PM
It is being debated in this forum about the characters if they are good or bad. If who are the hero and who aren't the hero.
With the end of the show I would like to use this debate to ask each one how do you see the way the writers used an opened for interpretation world view in a way that each one of us were able to see the characters in different ways.
For exemple, many of us see Nick as the hero of the show while others see him as just a corrupted cop.
Personally, I would point out the fact that Nick apparently always choose his own grimm interests in place of his oath as a cop. Can this selfish view (as a way to speak) be seeing as trend in all characters of the show?
With the end of the show I would like to use this debate to ask each one how do you see the way the writers used an opened for interpretation world view in a way that each one of us were able to see the characters in different ways.
For exemple, many of us see Nick as the hero of the show while others see him as just a corrupted cop.
Personally, I would point out the fact that Nick apparently always choose his own grimm interests in place of his oath as a cop. Can this selfish view (as a way to speak) be seeing as trend in all characters of the show?
“If two people agree on everything, one of them is unnecessary.”
— Attributed to Winston Churchill
— Attributed to Winston Churchill