03-10-2019, 03:00 PM
Quote:This brought a question to my mind. Do you think Grimm would have been a more morally correct show had they put kids into it? Juliette gets the bean bag everytime for staying with Nick thick and thin, but how would he have reacted had there been a couple of little ones running around?
(03-10-2019, 01:38 PM)syscrash Wrote: This is a good example of something that is not a moral issue. This is a cultural issue. This is not even a right or wrong issue. Studies have shown the makeup of a family does not define what is good or bad for a child. It is the dynamics between the members that matters. Point of fact. our last president was raised by a single mother with an absentee father. But even from the perspective of the show. It was never implied that Adalind was concerned that Kelly need to be with his father and that is why she was there. It was always shown she needed and wanted Nick protection. Yes she did make several statement about how and why both her kids needed their father. But she never used that to determine what she did. It was why Adalind agreed to joint custody with Sean.
You misunderstand my question. What I was theorizing is how Nick would act if he had a couple of children from day one, not Adalind coming into his house with a child conceived from what many consider as rape.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.