07-21-2018, 04:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-21-2018, 04:35 AM by dicappatore.)
(07-21-2018, 02:12 AM)syscrash Wrote: are you saying in the real world, surnames that are also names of particular species of animals do not exist
[/quotes]
seeing as the only species that uses surname is homosapien, and I don't know of homosapien being used as a surname. The
answer would be it does not exist.
Yes Blutbad's are members of the Blutbaden family. Just like a goose is a member of a family of geese. Most people know that adding s does not make all words plural. using the singular reference or the plural reference in no way changes the species.
As with the goose example you can have a family of geese, for grammatical reason you can not have a family of goose. With monroe you can not have a family of blubad, you can have a family of blutbaden. that distinction is an English rule, not a zoology or taxonomy rule. I am sure the many scholars that have spent their life time defining and creating the study of species. Might take acceptation to calling their work BS.
I know I been out of school for some time, but back in the days they were teaching me about humans, Homo Sapiens, they were part of a subdivision of the Animal Kingdom called Mammals. Now, as far as Wesen go, when woged, we did see what we could classify as some being of reptilian, bird, fish, or amphibians even if when they were not woged, they still looked and functioned like real humanoids. But for this discussion we will stick to just Monroe's species.
As for Blutbaden, I am sorry to shock your (cough) higher intellect but in my simple world. They would fall in the same category as Homo Sapiens, classified as Mammals, just like the rest of us Kehrseite. Now, I must admit, this is as far as I can go with the information that was provided to me, on the fictional TV show called Grimm, about these fictional species called Wesen.
I do not possess the additional knowledge you have from when you got your (cough) Doctorate on Wesen Physiology. So, until you can show me some kind of chart you can pull out of your "where the sun don't shine", to prove your summation, I will be sticking to my theory. I will be happy to disregard your convoluted knowledge of what ever you think you know.
You know what they say about aging men? Men that are balding in the front of their heads, think a lot. Men that are balding in the back (crown) of their heads, know a lot. Men that are balding on the front and on the back of their heads, they think they know a lot.
I bet you are balding all over.
Are you aware you are incapable of seeing when the discussion is ridiculed based instead of factual based. OMG, you constantly keep pointing out my ridicule as an incomprehensible opinions on my part. You have no clue on the comedic entertaining relief you are providing on these threads?
Stop and think. The guy pulls out a plate with a family crest. You go on and on a tirade and tangents into a biology lessons. Yea, I went along with it for the entertaining value. Holly Crap, this has to be the "Mother of all Deflections".
BTW, Am I the only one that finds this discussion to be more interesting than the thread topic?
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!