01-04-2019, 02:52 PM
Quote:What is weird is, what is the purpose to do so. Do they think most viewers are so easily led and to believe what they did not see? The bigger question is, why even bother. What is the purpose to make an evil character, such as Juliette, that was changed into an evil character by the creative team, not to be evil. What purpose does it serve.My purpose is to try and understand how so many people place ideology above logic. Example the argument about evidence. several post state Henrette never said anything about evidence. Yet they admit she said be careful they used to burn witches. It just amazes me that people can not see the connection. Another is Nick with a gun is more powerful then a hexenbiest with magic. both topics are argued using ideology of how people see things. Yet when I make a logical observation. I get that was not in the show, or it is fantasy so there is no logic.
As in the above post it stated that Juliette is evil. Yet the show made a point to give all the main characters a plausible denial rationalization for their actions. Take the biggest current opinion that Juliette caused and killed Kelly. Yet in the show it was never implied in the planing what was going to happen. Yet people argue she should have known, what did she think they where going to do. The show made a point to have Juliette upstairs where there was no ambiguity that she did not take part in the kill. Yet people argue Juliette heard Juliette but failed to help. The point is the writers have chooses. Every move a character makes is for a reason. People argue as if Juliette just happened to be upstairs, as opposed to the writers wanted her upstairs. Even when the writers have Juleitte say I did not know. They argue she should have or that she was lying.
What I have noticed is there is correlation to how people see and argue about the show mirrors the same logic used when arguing things that happen in real life. I have noticed people view things exactly like they view commercials. If it sounds right and fits what they believe then it must be true. Even if it will not stand up to scrutiny of critical thinking. I am expecting numerous post disputing this, yet known will make a substantive argument. My question is why do commercials, propaganda, rhetoric work. Why do people believe in people that tell them what they want to hear even if it is not true. It is like the argument of Bc vs HW. which is good and which is bad. I tried to explain the concept of one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. yet few where able to get it. All i got back was numerous ideological explanations to support their view.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one