01-04-2019, 10:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-04-2019, 11:05 AM by dicappatore.)
(01-03-2019, 05:48 PM)Henry of green Wrote: Dicapptore I fully agree, also not only did Adalind have no clue about Kenneth’s plans for Kelly she also even had strong doubts that Kenneth could get Juliette ever betray Nick telling Kenneth that Juliette may have beaten up a few people but she’s never going betray Nick.
Adalind- Okay, she may have beat up a couple people in a bar, I mean, God knows we've all done that, but there is no way she's going to betray Nick, if that's where you're going.
Also syscrash keeps falsely stating the Henrietta told Juliette not to leave evidence when in reality on the show she said no such things she actually said this, Henrietta-You must learn to control yourself! Now don't forget, they used to burn witches at the stake. She tells Juliette she needs to control herself as they used to burn witches that’s very different than saying she shouldn’t leave evidence.
Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk...ode=s04e12
Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk...ode=s04e19
Henry, its the same old, same old here. Typical people unhappy with what they saw on the screen, so after the fact, they try to change the narrative to support their contradictory opinions.
What is weird is, what is the purpose to do so. Do they think most viewers are so easily led and to believe what they did not see? The bigger question is, why even bother. What is the purpose to make an evil character, such as Juliette, that was changed into an evil character by the creative team, not to be evil. What purpose does it serve.
I used to watch The Walking Dead show a lot but around Season 7, I started to get tired of how the Rick character began to be less aggressive against his new foe, "The Nagan's". So I started to watch it less and less.
IMO, I started to not like the way this character was being portrayed by the show's creative team. I don't need to justify why I no longer liked this character by making crap up about him. In my arguments with friends about why I support my opinion of this character, I will use what I saw how this character was behaving, why do I need to make up stuff I didn't like, when there is plenty of stuff I saw on the screen for me to dislike?
Going back to Grimm. I get it, not everyone has to like Nick and not everyone has to hate Juliette but to make up shitz about fantasy character in a fantasy show to back up a different opinion is nuts. if you believe in your opinion, why make up stuff and claim it to be an opinion to be respected?
You want respect? Use what we all saw and extrapolate an opinion on what we all saw, and not make shitz up such as Henrietta telling Juliette not to leave evidence or claiming Adalind had knowledge on what Ken was planning before Ken knew what was coming down or claiming Juliette had no participation in the death of her innocent neighbors and Kelly.
Let us also not forget the laughable claim that Kelly was working for the Royals when she rescued Adalind and baby Diana from the same Royals she was, supposedly working for.
See the text in the caption below;
(01-01-2019, 10:53 AM)irukandji Wrote: What exactly is the difference between Kelly and a Verrat? The verrat worked for the royals and were at Nick's house to take the baby.
Kelly worked for the royals as well and showed up at Nick's house to.....surprise.....take the baby!
I know there are posters here who give no credence to the verrat and look upon them as thugs for the royals. In what way was Kelly so different?
You act as though Kelly's trust is some great and treasured thing, but you have yet to state why. Before you accuse me of ambiguity, why don't you take a slice of your own advice?
Gees, talk about convoluted delusional claims and then post replies such as :
(01-03-2019, 07:27 PM)irukandji Wrote: You know it never fails to amaze me, these continual complaints about the contradictory opinions, not adhering to canon (according to the poster's own version of canon that is), the constant questions and blabber asking if we're all watching the same show, the youtube videos (that no one ever watches btw), the huge explanations, and on and on and on. Some of you complain and complain and complain. It's really quite entertaining.
However, it's usually the same old song, the same youtube videos that no one watches, the same platitudes about canon, the same questions asking if we're all watching the same show, the same complaints, the same huge explanations, and on and on and on.
For those of you who hold yourself to some kind of imaginary high standard of series debate, why would you bother coming back to post? Isn't that, in itself, pointless?
DOES THIS POSTER HAVE NO SHAME? ROFLMFAO !
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!