(03-10-2017, 02:39 PM)Purity Wrote:(03-10-2017, 02:33 PM)irukandji Wrote: First of all, I'm not denying anything. The debate was not about Monroe's past or Rosalee's past, or Hank's past or anyone's past. The question posed, which had nothing to do with what I was talking about was whether they should be redeemed and deserve happiness.Okey so your are now saying that you are fine with Monroe are others finding and deserving happiness but Nick only should not disregarding the past acts Nick's friends have done?
I was talking about Nick and *only* Nick. It wasn't me who brought up the rest of the characters deserving happiness. *I* said *Nick* didn't deserve happiness.
When did I bring Monroe into the debate?
(03-10-2017, 02:37 PM)rpmaluki Wrote: Doesn't everyone deserve happiness?
Your question should be formatted differently. You should ask instead:
Is everyone entitled to happiness?
The answer is no.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.