(02-07-2017, 03:32 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(02-07-2017, 03:23 PM)irukandji Wrote:(02-07-2017, 03:18 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(02-07-2017, 03:14 PM)irukandji Wrote:(02-07-2017, 03:05 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: No, he did not. IMO if Adalind do not lie for him he might have only needed to spend a lot of money on legal fees since he still had BC help. IMO Nick was trying to save his life and his friends so I do not see it the same way.
What a prince. So in other words Nick doesn't have any higher view of Adalind than Renard does. What then is the difference between these two men?
Sean was only trying to save money and Nick was trying save his life and others.
It doesn't make Nick any better than Sean, Mary. It only makes him self-centered.
IMO saving friends of both Nick and Adalind is not self-centered. Other posters say that Adalind does not take enough risk for Nick.
My thought on this is that Nick should never be willing to have Adalind lie illegally for him, no matter what. I get what you're saying about her being demonstrative in her love for him, but for him to let her take that kind of risk.....he continues to prove what a worthless worm he is.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.