02-07-2017, 03:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-07-2017, 03:10 PM by MarylikesGrimm.)
(02-07-2017, 02:51 PM)izzy Wrote:(02-07-2017, 08:50 AM)wfmyers1207 Wrote: For what it's worth, I don't think Renard thought of Adalind as anything but a piece of a$$ and a sometimes useful tool.
Sorry if that turn of phrase offends anyone. Just calling it like I see it.
Uh, your a guy right? I 'm a guy, is Adalind anything but a piece of a$$ to any guy who isn't a total idiot? Why would she be anything but that?. That is what she made of herself by her own deliberate behavior. She has two children by two different fathers, neither of which was she in any type of meaningful relationships. That pretty much is the definition of a tramp, whore, or as you put it: piece of a$$. That is what you make of yourself when you engage is casual sex. And she was a stupid one at that. If you want respect, respect yourself. Having unprotected sex with someone you have no relationship with and possibly subjecting yourself to pregnancy and social disease is not how you respect yourself. It makes you a stupid whore. Moreover, in the fantasy world of Grimm, Adalind was stupid to either the second or third power because she was having unpredictable interspecies sexual relations without any idea what the resultant offspring might be.
Renard may be a lot of things but he never struck me as an idiot. Adalind, Juliette, and Adalind's mom are the type of woman a guy spends a long weekend with at best. I hope to high heaven that don't change his character and make him sympathetic toward either of these women.
The only reason I posted this, is because you indicated that you did not want to offend people by speaking the truth. I don't suffer from that particular malady and consider this the equivalent of a public service announcement.
Cheers...
Let me understand you, in your eyes Adalind is a tramp so that justifies Sean and/or Nick mistreating her and her children. IMO Sean who knew who he was having sex with Adalind and he asked her as a favor for her to have sex with Hank. Sean is the one who demanded she have sex with him at the BC mansion and she turned him down with a vase. IMO Adalind made mistakes and is trying to fix them but it is not fair to mark women and her children for mistreatment yet allow men to feel free to have sex without responsibility. If I do not understand your views, please feel free to explain.
This was a public service announcement.
(02-07-2017, 02:50 PM)irukandji Wrote:(02-07-2017, 02:15 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: Her willingness to lie in court for him over Renard.
I have a question. Did Nick talk her out of this at all?
No, he did not. IMO if Adalind do not lie for him he might have only needed to spend a lot of money on legal fees since he still had BC help. IMO Nick was trying to save his life and his friends so I do not see it the same way.
Women characters do not have to be having sex with the lead to be important to the story.