(01-29-2017, 11:03 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Do you watch Supernatural if you did you would see (the series shows more than one type of ghost) that some ghost are a death omens some are death echos. Base on that series Meisner likely is a death echo with a side of warning.
I don't believe that Meisner is a residual haunting or a death echo with warning, or any of that. His ghost is way too communicative and active for that and it just doesn't mesh with what's been communicated about ghosts. BTW, I don't watch Supernatural, but I was a fan of Ghosthunters and Ghostadventures as well as Coast to Coast for years. While they all used different terminology, their findings were often the same with regard to ghosts. Either they were a residual, which mean the same type of haunting over and over or they were the other kind, which was a warning. But even the ones that were warnings were usually a one or two word phrase or some other such nonsense that came across on a tape recording. Oftentimes I couldn't get that it was a warning but the ghosthunters always interpreted it as a warning.
That said, I am skeptical that this is even a ghost that is haunting Renard. I would tend to go with it being more of a magic trick and Bonaparte is behind it.
As always, we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
(01-29-2017, 11:13 AM)Robyn Wrote: And the argument that she went with Kelly because she knew Kelly was good doesn’t hold water. Diana also went willingly with Kenneth & Juliette, the King, BC, and Meisner if you’re inclined to see him as bad.
Your post had so many good things in it, Robyn. I'll start with this first.
My point wasn't that Kelly was good or the king was evil. What I'm saying is the apparent destiny for Diana was to be held by one faction and one faction only. That faction would be the one who would contribute fully to her destiny. That faction would be the one who could use her as a tool for good or for evil.
But that didn't happen. Kelly had possession of her, the royalty had possession of her, HW had her, BC had her. She was exposed to humans, wesen, grimms, covert organizations, both good and bad. I don't know, she might still turn out bad. I'm just making a speculation here.
But what I think happened is that destiny was changed. No one person or organization got her and indoctrinated only their beliefs into her. Instead, she was in the hands of more than a few people who all instilled their beliefs in her. Her destiny may now be in her hands rather than someone else's who could use her for good or for evil. She doesn't seem to be an evil child so far. Maybe she's an instrument for good.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.