01-19-2017, 01:15 AM
Twice Adalind has shown even under Diana's influence with the dolls. A person has the ability to come to their senses and realize what they are doing. Saying that, Sean was perfectly capable of not stabbing Conrad even under Diana's influence. Unless Sean does not have the mental acuity that Adalind has. That would be hard to believe since Sean has been manipulating Adalind since season one.
The show gives you two exact scenes. Conrad is choking Meisner, Sean's choice is to kill Meisner. The second is Conrad is chocking Nick, Seans choice is to not resist killing Conrad. Both time Conrad was the head of BC and Sean was as involved with BC both times.
So how is it compassion to kill Meisner when Sean could have made the same choice he made for Nick. If he could kill Conrad for NIck why not kill Conrad for Meisner. This is the second time the show has replayed the exact same scenario showing a different out come.
the fist was the opinion that going after Diana could only end in the killing of Kelly. Later they have the same number of men. Armed the exact same way. Both group have the same killer mentality. They have both group going after a target that has a Grimm in the way. This shows Kelly dying was not a for gone conclusion. Kenneth could have used Chavez's approach.,
The same is true with Conrad. Sean could have as easily killed Conrad to save Meisner as he killed Conrad to save Nick. All of the reason people have posted as to why Sean could have not killed Conrad to save Meisner as disproved by Sean actually killing Conrad. The show even went out of it's way to show even under the dolls influence one still has free will.
The show gives you two exact scenes. Conrad is choking Meisner, Sean's choice is to kill Meisner. The second is Conrad is chocking Nick, Seans choice is to not resist killing Conrad. Both time Conrad was the head of BC and Sean was as involved with BC both times.
So how is it compassion to kill Meisner when Sean could have made the same choice he made for Nick. If he could kill Conrad for NIck why not kill Conrad for Meisner. This is the second time the show has replayed the exact same scenario showing a different out come.
the fist was the opinion that going after Diana could only end in the killing of Kelly. Later they have the same number of men. Armed the exact same way. Both group have the same killer mentality. They have both group going after a target that has a Grimm in the way. This shows Kelly dying was not a for gone conclusion. Kenneth could have used Chavez's approach.,
The same is true with Conrad. Sean could have as easily killed Conrad to save Meisner as he killed Conrad to save Nick. All of the reason people have posted as to why Sean could have not killed Conrad to save Meisner as disproved by Sean actually killing Conrad. The show even went out of it's way to show even under the dolls influence one still has free will.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one