01-15-2017, 10:39 AM
(01-15-2017, 10:19 AM)irukandji Wrote:In a previous post you mentioned that neither gentleman's blood was used for the spell, if you had to be technical, traces of Nick's blood were used but that wasn't the point of the scene. There's no definitive/singular way to use blood in curses or oaths on this show. To expect it to play out one way and disregard what actually happened is a waste. There's nothing to support your point of view that Adalind changed the spell when the spell was still depended on the men to act out, her testimony is Nick's part of the oath which "he" fulfilled because if she didn't, as Syscrash pointed out, it would be Adalind's blood that condemns Nick to death. Sean’s important to Diana, not to Adalind, she literally threatened him last week.(01-15-2017, 10:09 AM)rpmaluki Wrote: You forget that Adalind still has traces of Nick's blood in her....
I would like to hear the rest of what you were going to say here about the traces of each other's blood in Adalind and Nick.
(01-15-2017, 10:09 AM)rpmaluki Wrote: but even then she's still the facilitator between the two, it's just that Nick part involves her going to court to testify. He fulfilled his part. She went there with the intention to testify. Adalind would never have reneged on going because Nick's freedom depended on her going to court and claiming to be Renard's alibi. It was Hank who made them aware of the convening of court. Had she not shown up in time, the noose would have wrapped itself around Nick, which was probably Renard's bonus besides being cleared of all charges by using his BC connections.
I know all of this. I saw the entire episode yesterday. I don't think Adalind reneged on Nick or on Renard. I think she changed the spell because she knows neither man is known for keeping his word. Both are cunning who often change outcomes of given situations. But she doesn't want to see either one of them dead. This I do believe.