You forget that Adalind still has traces of Nick's blood in her but even then she's still the facilitator between the two, it's just that Nick part involves her going to court to testify. He fulfilled his part. She went there with the intention to testify. Adalind would never have reneged on going because Nick's freedom depended on her going to court and claiming to be Renard's alibi. It was Hank who made them aware of the convening of court. Had she not shown up in time, the noose would have wrapped itself around Nick, which was probably Renard's bonus besides being cleared of all charges by using his BC connections.
(01-15-2017, 10:07 AM)irukandji Wrote:if that was the case, Adalind wouldn’t have rushed to court if it was all for naught anyway. What would be the point of trying to keep an oath that's already invalid?(01-15-2017, 10:01 AM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: I know you think Nick is a corrupt, lying scumbag, but I don't think Adalind shares your opinion of him.
All I said was that Adalind knows neither man is going to keep his word so she changed the spell. That doesn't equate to her thinking Nick is a lying scumbag at all. Not sure what you're getting at here, but I wanted to clarify as it appears you misunderstood my point. In other words, what I think about Nick has nothing to do with this post.