(12-23-2016, 10:41 AM)Purity Wrote: hmm, not everything we say or write are speculations, lots of pointers are bulls eye facts. Best resolution would be how viewers watch and understand TV shows, Some with life experiences, some try to go into the minds of the creators or writers or other....which ever one is chosen, one of them is a non speculated approach but what was really meant to be expressed.
Personaly me, I still will stick to the facts and points that Juliette knew what would happen to Kelly and her getting back at Nick.
There are lots of pointers and bulls eyes on facts, I'm not arguing that. What I'm saying is there are very little facts about Juliette's background, which translate to speculation on our part. It has to because we have little to nothing to base her actions on.
Let's talk about the betrayal of Kelly for a moment. Why did Juliette do it? Because Kenneth let her out of jail and Nick wouldn't? Because she had a beef with Nick? Because she was a cold-hearted bitch without feeling? Because she hated Adalind? Because she's Juliette and no one really knows? Because she felt Diana was taken unfairly, and felt she'd be better off with the royals?
You could take any one of these and argue to a conclusion. But you'd still be arguing on speculation. You can't go back to facts about Juliette that could lead you to any conclusion. It's all speculation.
Hell, people are still blaming her for refusing Nick's proposal and she actually did give a reason for that. I have seen many posters acknowledge her reason, but they blame her just the same. Why is that? Because there's nothing in her background to support her.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.