(08-31-2016, 12:40 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:Isn't the issue that the legal system isn't designed to deal with the reality of a world populated by wesen a fault of the writers?
You can not design a system for something that defy the laws of physics. unless they are woged when samples are taken. The forensics would not match. So you would have to create something that forces them to woge so you could get a sample. That would be a violation of their civil rights. That would be equal to forcing someone to under go surgery to find evidence that they swallowed. Under our system you can not force someone to have a bullet removed so you can do ballistics.
Example how would you ever prove a hexenbiest snapped someone neck with their mind. In Diana case how would you ever right any kind of rule you could use to prove Diana killed Rachel.
Who says wesen woge every time they commit a crime? In most cases, they only woge at Nick because they realize he's a Grimm. It's an interesting question you raise with regard to DNA. DNA has had to be taken on wesen, long before Nick became a Grimm. How do you suppose it was explained?
(08-30-2016, 03:23 PM)izzy Wrote: Interesting you should mention this. I just completed my summer training camp for LEOs, and Grimm and Nick were a constant topic around the campfire at night when we were BSing about.
I will say that the jocular comments of past years in regard to Grimm were now gone and there was a decisive negative tone to how they now viewed the show. That shift in perception had everything to do with the horrific ambushes of police and how officers now view the way the media portrays them. We may view Grimm as entertainment, but those who have their rear end on the line may not be so appreciative toward anything that feeds a negative narrative.
I find this really fascinating that the LEOs were discussing Grimm. Are a lot of them fans of the show or were some referred to it by the comments of others?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.