07-18-2016, 04:26 PM
New Guy the two statement you keep asking a link for. You now want to prefix your response to only include interviews. I never said interviews. My statements where based on the show. I don't not need an external source to validate what is said in the show. I consider comprehension of the written word validation.
The first statement
"The writers have stated Juliette did not know Kenneth's plans."
In the transscript
"Juliette said: I didn't know Kenneth was gonna do that."
That is narrative. The way writers make a statement.
The second statment
"Greenwalt has said they never intended for Juliette to be responsible for Kelly's death."
In the transcript
"Juliette said: I know. I thought they just wanted Diana."
This states she was planning a kidnapping not an execution.
Narrative is provided to clarify ambiguity. To argue for what she should have known was eliminated by the statement of what she did know.
I do think it is funny this entire post steams from. You think the writers and lying and you feel you can prove it.
The first statement
"The writers have stated Juliette did not know Kenneth's plans."
In the transscript
"Juliette said: I didn't know Kenneth was gonna do that."
That is narrative. The way writers make a statement.
The second statment
"Greenwalt has said they never intended for Juliette to be responsible for Kelly's death."
In the transcript
"Juliette said: I know. I thought they just wanted Diana."
This states she was planning a kidnapping not an execution.
Narrative is provided to clarify ambiguity. To argue for what she should have known was eliminated by the statement of what she did know.
I do think it is funny this entire post steams from. You think the writers and lying and you feel you can prove it.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one