I believe you are incorrect. You mentioned Back to the Future as a comparison model to the Grimm series finale. I don't know of anyone who asked, "What happened to Marty, or what happened to his parents, or were his parents still together at the end?" There was no fuzziness about how Marty got back to 1955 or how he got back to 1985. It was clearly shown to us, and not only that, there was no ridiculous explanation of a theory that made no sense (i.e., Schrodinger's Cat) or hints of some pedophilia overtones involving a child bride that turned out to be stupidity. People were left scratching their heads at the end of Grimm. You know this.
The truth is, no one has ever explained it clearly, period. That includes us. As a comparison, if you asked Michael J. Fox to explain the ending of Back to the Future, I would lay odds he wouldn't state it was a "hard reset", Whatever that is.
The fact of the matter is, Guintoli didn't know, Kouf didn't know and Greenwalt didn't know. They proved that in their idiotic interviews. If we, on a forum that has little activity, want to speculate about what we think the ending meant, why is that so terrible?
I don't understand why you feel it's out of control.
The truth is, no one has ever explained it clearly, period. That includes us. As a comparison, if you asked Michael J. Fox to explain the ending of Back to the Future, I would lay odds he wouldn't state it was a "hard reset", Whatever that is.
The fact of the matter is, Guintoli didn't know, Kouf didn't know and Greenwalt didn't know. They proved that in their idiotic interviews. If we, on a forum that has little activity, want to speculate about what we think the ending meant, why is that so terrible?
I don't understand why you feel it's out of control.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.