02-27-2016, 09:18 PM
Quote:What am I supposed to see? You didn't explain why he wasn't raped. You just come out and say, 'Nick wasn't raped', period. There's no substance to back up your argument because you didn't provide any substance. You went all over the place except to address the point.From a technical stand point what Nick did to Adalind was rape as well as what Adalind did to Nick. But the question was why is it not considered rape. two different questions. For example. You get home your wallet is gone, did you loses it or was it stolen. One would give you a sense of embarrassment the other a sense of being violated. Lets say you set it down next to you, a person sits down and walks away with it. Did the person that picked it up seal it. do you have a reason to feel violated. Let's say you set it down, person sits next to you. You walk away without it. They pick it up did they steal it, can you feel violated. The point I am making is, it is perception, not the act.
I have always contended Nick may not have known it was Adalind, but he sure knew it was not Juliette, or something was wrong or different with Juliette. So either he did not care he was with what did not act like Juliette or he took advantage that Juliette was not herself. And that troubles me more, that fact that Nick seeing something is different, knowing the strange is his reality. Would not take the time to investigate why his beloved is acting so different. In the car Juliette ask about the gown, but it doesn't see the disconnect. She would remember if she had put it there. So either he know or didn't care who it was. So where is the violation.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one